Global Journal of Research Publication strives exhausting towards the unfold of knowledge base, and therefore the quality of the printed article utterly depends upon effective peer reviewing method. Reviewing of manuscript is a vital half within the method of publication. Reviewers square measure asked to create Associate in Nursing analysis and supply recommendations to make sure the scientific quality of the manuscript is on par with our standards. Reviewers don’t seem to be expected to rewrite a paper. GJR PUBLICATION reviewers square measure requested to supply authentic, positive review comments and critics for the various manuscript. A reviewer should review the articles received from the editorial workplace or the editor among the specifically mentioned timeline.
• After receiving the invite, reviewer is requested to intimate their accessibility to complete the review in given time.
• One will intimate us your opinion of acceptive or declining the invite. If you’re ineffective to just accept the invite you’ll recommend any of your colleagues, in order that several editor could invite that person to review and you will not transfer your invite.
• Articles square measure allotted supported the analysis interests of the reviewer. they’ll approach the allotted editorial workplace, if the manuscript is on the far side their experience.
• After distribution manuscript reviewer will contact the editorial workplace if there’s any drawback relating to time or conflict of interest, supported that the reviewer could extend the point or cancel the review assignment.
• Reviewer ought to have a glance at the allotted manuscript, whether or not the paper fits among the explicit scope of the journal or not. Reviewers mustn’t be biased or partial whereas reviewing the manuscript.
• They ought to valuate the manuscript among the provided timeline so as to facilitate timely completion of the review method.
• During the review method, if you discover that the analysis paper doesn’t work into the scope of interest, you will intimate the editorial workplace.
• Reviewers don’t seem to be amused to debate concerning the paper with several author(s).
• We request reviewers to not use the data of the manuscript for his or her own use and to shield it from any variety of violation.
• Criticism ought to be given dispassionately and offensive remarks don’t seem to be acceptable Confidential remarks to be done and you’ll advise the editor for acceptance, rejection or modification. Their comments and reviews mustn’t ever be influenced by the race, religion, position, ethnicity, language, origin, gender or any political agencies.
• If you’re interested to hitch as a reviewer for our journals, kindly mail us your CV at the side of journal of interest to email@example.com we’ll answer you at intervals twenty four hours.